lodash merge github

Post 1 of 14

Locking this issue as it's no longer constructive. So let me get this straight...You thought you could make a better Underscore. Toggle navigation. Libs are hard work. locked and limited conversation to collaborators, Repository owner So why are you pulling this PR stunt here? Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. History. There is using the main lodash function as a way to wrap a new array that has a given element length, then using the fill method off of that to fill the array with zeros. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? Lodash-PHP. Either way Lodash comes out on top. You signed in with another tab or window. The function zipObjectDeep can be tricked into adding or modifying properties of the Object prototype. Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? _.chunk(array, [size=1]) source npm package. Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, numbers, objects, strings, etc. I want to merge the objects based on a specific key (here label[1]). So would lodash function behaviors be a super set of underscore? From what I understand this would need to be the case in order to have https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash and https://www.npmjs.com/package/underscore continue to work. Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. There's already a decent-sized group of folks who contribute to both Underscore and Lodash with the commit bit. As a matter of principle, an open source project must be allowed to thrive or perish on its merit. Point to a single instance where support for Underscore was raised and you had a civil exchange of ideas without outright dismissing the other developer. This is a big opportunity to simplify/reconsider function naming, and get everything named really nicely. Use consistent nullish check for `array`. Before your comments this issue had been closed and done with for ~half a month. Now you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too? deprecating hundreds of packages and creating new copies instead, only for the new name), it might make more sense to just deprecate the one “underscore” package in favor of “lodash” and the related packages. Ideally I'd like the Underscore docs to be written, Strict(er) SemVer. I was wondering if someone know who I should contact to determine what is permissible as far as naming and licensing, as this is derived from the Lodash … @jdalton For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. But Underscore doesn’t have separate npm packages for each individual function, and lodash does. Hello, I'm working on a port of Lodash for the latest version of GameMaker which now supports functions as a first class citizen and structs (which emulates JS Objects). You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. download the GitHub extension for Visual Studio, fix: fix the params of Hash#delete in in jsdoc (. The thread is a bit long but I think most have been respectful. I'm still of the opinion that true believer SemVer isn't something that actually exists in the real world (most changes are subtly backwards-incompatible in minor ways), but I have no problem praying to this golden cow to keep the philistines happy ;), "Governance Model": I don't think we need anything fancy here. If nothing happens, download GitHub Desktop and try again. In your mind, it’s just taking out the "competition", I understand. Commits See full diff in compare view Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. I don't think anyone is being dismissive. In addition, request is on track to replace Underscore as the 3rd most directly depended on npm package by September of this year. I. So this will not be a getting started post on lodash, or javaScript in general. The Name: "Lodash" is very cute, but keeping "Underscore" makes the most sense, both for historical and _ variable reasons. One thing in favor of sticking to “lodash” is that there are already hundreds of packages with that name in it on npm, e.g. The whole point of this thread is discussing a merging of the two projects or at least sharing a common core to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. _.findIndex(array, [callback=identity], [thisArg]) source npm package. I tried to replace underscore with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ. Attacking @jdalton accomplishes nothing... cough cough Ad hominem. Meaning within the span of a year Lodash has risen to the top spot while Underscore will have fallen from 1st to 4th with no sign of recovery. So what? @tiandavis just fyi i saw @jridgewell and @jdalton out at brunch last week...I think he's a part of the conspiracy, too!!! Changed lodash.groupby and lodash.merge to type="module" Errors: [same as #2] 4.) Chill out, all of you. Creates an array of elements split into groups the length of size.If array can't be split evenly, the final chunk will be the remaining elements. Cleanup package.json and CONTRIBUTING.md. Totally fine with me. A modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. Not at all. It will compare two objects and give you the key of all properties that are either only in object1, only in object2, or are both in object1 and object2 but have different values: /* * Compare two objects by reducing an array of keys in obj1, having the * keys in obj2 as the intial value of the result. Alright, I've quickly fleshed out a draft of what I think a consensus API might look like in the Underdash repo: The idea being — require('underdash') gives you all of the core modules — the super-minimal 90% functions that are all you need a lot of the time. Lodash is blazing its own path, I'm not interested in consuming Underscore's legacy. As an exercise to the repo collaborators, let's see what it would look like to pull in all of the good stuff from https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib as well — the more useful of them going in "More" and the more esoteric going in a new third-level "Contrib" section. Contribute with something substantive instead." numbers, objects, strings, etc. Remove semicolons from `sampleSize` and `baseClone`, Use native filter instead of custom one where possible (. paket add lodash --version 4.17.11 Importing lodash functions from lodash-es. Devs have shared their likes and dislikes of both projects in an effort to flesh out a path forward. @schmod Getting waaay ahead of the cart here. I don't think I've demeaned another's hard work or contributions. Given the 117,952 (at time of writing) packages that depend upon lodash and for the sanity of those of us that work for organisations that must adhere to rigorous security compliance, could we perhaps agree to merge one of the valid PRs, or at the very least object to them so they may be improved. The Lodash library exported as a UMD module. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? Demean Underscore with your left hand and then pretend you didn't mean anything by it with your right. Use Git or checkout with SVN using the web URL. The merge lodash object methods will recursively merge down own and inherited object properties while the lodash assign will just assign properties. Twitter | Ensure escapeRegExp returns an empty string when passing falsy values (, Update `filterObject` docs to reference `pickBy` (, Coerce findLastIndex and lastIndexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (. https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach. io.js ∶ Node.js and merge already! JDD got in touch with me over email this morning, inquiring about the possibility of merging Underscore and Lodash together. That line was crossed and it is not ok. @tiandavis: Stop. lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras. The `opt-cli` pre-push functionality was removed from lodash just a few days after it was added (see 2cd12c3), but the documentation encouraging contributors to use it still remains.Remove to avoid confusion for new contributors. Hey all. The lodash assign and merge methods are two good examples of lodash object methods. Could underscore (on npm) just become an official build of lodash (like lodash-underscore build used to be)? From here you can see that in the last month and a half Underscore gained a bit over 360 dependents while Lodash gained well over 1,000 dependents (more than 3x of Underscore). Repository owner Because npm doesn't allow name redirects (AFAIK), the merged project would be available as a module under both names for the foreseeable future. Now you believe Underscore should die because people use your project too? Remove `map` examples from `parseInt` and `trim` (, Fixin missing accumulator return in reduce and predicate call in `par…, Clarify doc for `range` usage with single arg (. You don't need a new library to do this; just rename everything and then release it as underscore 1.8.4. To try to get a more apples to apples compairison, this is what I did. Prototype Pollution is a vulnerability affecting JavaScript. No one has malicious intent here, so let's not devolve into bait trolling. Merge docs as well. Clearly, you believe your project is so much better right? Oh…there wasn't any? Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, So there is really not much more to say about it beyond additional ways of doing so with and without lodash. Fixin scope range for var declarations in `hasPath` and `hasPathIn`. Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue. All I see is two popular libraries. Your comments are not helpful. Of course, you can require any or as few of the individual modules as you like, if that floats your boat. And as for the naming, how about keeping underscore for the lightweight version of lodash, like basic / core module, but the whole ecosystem will be lodash thing. array (Array): The array to process. As another who has followed both threads I'm puzzled at how you could come to that conclusion. Learn more about github-labels@0.5.2 vulnerabilities. So, there would be no friction at all by just continuing to refer to the existing lodash modules. Creating copies of those on the other hand, would. Overview. The Lodash method `_.merge` exported as a module. require('underdash/more') gives you everything. Can't...? We help and push each other. Wiki | unlocked this conversation, The Big Kahuna: Underscore + Lodash Merge Thread. Or the other way around? Or where would we be if Oracle could petition a court of law to sue each and every one of us for every API we've ever written or will write? You could try to publish it to npm under your own scope and edit the resolution accordingly. Consistent use (always) of parentheses in arrow functions. Sure thing. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. So _.assign, as well as other methods like _.merge, and _.extend are some of the many useful methods for working with objects in a project where lodash is part of the stack. This really is both teams trying to work together. Ok, then I challenge you to point to a place here where you didn't encourage - with your silence - your followers to trash Underscore. …Too soon? I'm sorry you feel that way. Further discussion can be had over on underdash. good idea to have a deep understanding of how objects work in javaScript It's all a "misunderstanding" - I get it. Too much negativity in my inbox. We get it, but it makes tickets hard to have conversations on. In many cases this might not preset a problem, but it can result in unexpected behavior now and then it you do not understand the differences between these various methods that ar… The one thing which has remained a constant is the motivation from you and a small group of Lodash users is disingenuous at best and malicious at worst. Do you actually have any numbers to back this up? I think the other data points I've provided have more than covered it. Lodash isn't developed in a vacuum. based on browserifing a file with module.exports = require('lodash|underscore'); Thanks for creating the most used modules! They can keep it. Actually you can import a single function using the 'lodash.merge' library import merge from 'lodash.merge' const result: any = merge(obj1, obj2) Site | If a property name is provided for callback the created ".pluck" style callback will return the property value of the given element. Can't...? Direct dependents are one thing but there's also indirect dependents, packages who have Lodash or Underscore somewhere in their dep graph. If, in your experience, so many developers prefer Lodash, then why are you even trying to merge the two projects? Contributing | Lodash-PHP tries to mimick lodash.js as close as possible. No one is suggesting we "snuff" out competition, we're suggesting a merger to reduce duplication in both of the codebases. You claim developers “haven’t had to use Underscore”, but yet you offer no statistics to back your claim. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. This blatant, clearly orchestrated, campaign to bring about its demise is an affront to the very nature of open source software - an ecosystem that every single one of us here derive our livelihood. Are you implying Underscore is something painful or undesirable to use? And as such, Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you or any other developer to the validity of its merit. Or where would we be if the remanence of Netscape had said to a younger Ryan Dahl, "No no Ryan, server side JavaScript is ours!!" - a JavaScript repository on GitHub // Cherry-pick methods for smaller browserify/rollup/webpack bundles. I was merely stating that Lodash is established enough that there are some devs today who have gotten their start with Lodash instead of Underscore. Adjust spacing in template string expressions. We should take advantage. Please STOP +1 and :+1: -ing GitHub tickets. Lodash is released under the MIT license & supports modern environments. _.differenceBy(iteratee, array, values) # Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓝ This method is like _.difference except that it accepts iteratee which is invoked for each element of array and values to generate the criterion by which they're compared. That right there helps immensely with many normal use cases. I may have missed and or fudged things ... feel free to edit as you like. 1: const c = _.assign({}, a, b); If you’d like to learn more about lodash, check out my free e-book about Functional Programming in JavaScript. I encourage you to take some time to reread this thread and its related thread. Importing lodash functions from lodash-es. Let's move discussion over to underdash then. Although many of the methods are now native in javaScript itself, there is much more that lodash has to offer. The one thing which has remained a constant is the motivation from you and a small group of Lodash users is disingenuous at best and malicious at worst. Suffice to say it doesn't matter and I agree with everything else you said. Then there's each package's trending growth. Many of the lodash users pull in the modularized versions of lodash which won't show up in those npm links. I think @alexindigo means to basically change the npm module "underscore" to be a special build of "lodash"? I created a gist to get a better apples to apples size compassion https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0. Ditching the Underscore name won’t fly for a lot of users either. This is a very common problem for github issues posted on HN/any social media. We already know your position. This is a post on the lodash method _.join, as well as the corresponding Array.prototype.join method that is being referenced. And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." And please do explain what you mean by "...and haven't had to use Underscore." Im looking to merge/combine objects in an array each with a series of nested arrays. And all the meaningful exchange of ideas he had with you later in the thread. For the record, I've followed both threads from the beginning. Installation. Where would we be if IBM, in all its former glory, abused its influence to make sure each and every one of us programmed COBOL for a living? I think we can at least share a common core though. Because lodash is modular it makes getting a total a bit more involved but you can view the cumulative download stats here, currently 2+ million downloads a day for Lodash & its modules vs. ~300k for Underscore. I challenge you to find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread. At almost 65 million downloads over the last two years (keep in mind, the project has been out for longer than that), Underscore has achieved more merit than most of us could ever hope to achieve for a project. Investigate swapping Underscore w/ Lo-Dash or upgrading Underscore, https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash.foreach, https://gist.github.com/xbudex/a03aaf17ab8f984c18f0, https://github.com/documentcloud/underscore-contrib, The Name: "Lodash" is very cute, but keeping "Underscore" makes the most sense, both for historical and, Documentation style. But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. The fact that we're discussing, collaborating, and working together is a positive thing. Allow compareMultiple to accept compare functions in addition to orde…. Yap, I agree. Underscore will copy all props (even prototypes) while lodash only copies hasOwnPropertys. Lodash-PHP is a port of the Lodash JS library to PHP. Am I wrong? Bumps @types/lodash from 4.14.165 to 4.14.166. Have to agree on the comment "lazy by default" of Lodash. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. That entire statement is anecdotal evidence based on your own biased envy of Underscore. How does Underscore-Contrib fit in to all this? Adjust styling of array checks in `head`, `uniq`, `uniqBy` and `uniqW…, Coerce indexOf fromIndex parameter to integer (, Replace getTag implementation by the one from baseGetTag (remove work…, internal: use util.types to migrate DEP0103 in Node.js (. If nothing happens, download the GitHub extension for Visual Studio and try again. That said, I think we can work together to reduce duplicated efforts & fragmentation across projects. Looking for Lodash modules written in ES6 or smaller bundle sizes? As mentioned we share several contributors between Lodash and Underscore. Let's kick stuff around a bit. lodash is a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & extras.. That might fix it. While I might also wonder a bit at the motivation, please note that Jeremy thought enough of this idea to bring it forth to the community. For projects that support PackageReference , copy this XML node into the project file to reference the package. One position I'm not changing is I don't believe a word you say. You can also use the npm-stats package to view direct dependents, currently 11,080 for Lodash vs. 9,391 for Underscore. That's cool. Well there you have it, the lodash last method is to just get the last element in the array. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase. Added require.js, with lodash.groupby and lodash.merge Errors:-- require.js:5 - Uncaught Error: Module name "lodash.merge" has not been loaded yet for context: _. Lodash is the dominate library in node/io.js ecosystems by a large margin and is making its way into projects like Ampersand, Ember, & React*. These properties will be present on all objects. Rock. Since. I wasn't suggesting Underscore change its name either. 3.) Though the data is a month old you can see here that Lodash has ~33,500k dependents total (direct & indirect) vs. ~14,761 for Underscore. It is a set of easy to use utility functions for everyday PHP projects. You claim Lodash is the “dominate library in node/io.js”. FP Guide | Our goal has been getting high quality utility methods to devs regardless of environment, module or package preference, style, or composition. Just kidding, I already saw how @jdalton "collaborated" with you above: RE @jdalton: @CrossEye to help the discussion and make it easier to digest can you try to keep your points on track and tangents to a minimum. Lodash’s modular methods are great for: Iterating arrays, objects, & strings; Manipulating & testing values; Creating composite functions. You wouldn't see Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d'état. About the name: IMHO the “_ variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a play of words on “underscore”. Sorry @akre54, but there is nothing of value going on in this thread. Lodash is the dominate library...by a large margin? Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution in zipObjectDeep due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-8203.. That collaboration wouldn't work well if we were hostile towards each other. From the author: "Folks. Chat. Review the build differences & pick one that’s right for you. [size=1] (number): The length of each chunk Returns (Array): Returns the new array of chunks. We decided to ignore our failing audit for now and wait to see if the new version gets published soon. I don't think I've said that. Search . Packages Repositories Login . I don't think that's a fair statement as installing one module may install n others (because they depend on one another); i.e. Both names are highly depended on. Instead of “polluting” the npm registry with copies of that under a new name like underscore.foreach (i.e. I'm prepping lodash v4 which tackles many of the goals/items of the merge to proof things out and I'd dig some feedback over on the Underdash issue. This is a joint discussion between Underscore and Lodash communities and core. This is due to an incomplete fix to CVE-2018-3721. Because it's a fork there is --a lot-- of cross lib collaboration and planning to ensure developers can use either without headache. Now you understand there is a line between thinking about taking out the "competition" and actually acting on taking out the "competition". The join method in general then in javaScript is used to join an array of elements together into an string. It's clear your only intent by these statements is to demean Underscore itself while offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim. Docs | Module Formats. For anyone stumbling upon this thread, here's a more complete solution. Update links in CONTRIBUTING.md & README.md (, Fix string methods to handle empty values (, add round up description on ceil documentation (, Coerce to integer and set default value for chunk size parameter (, Do not use property shorthand in countBy documentation (, Add extended and supplement combining marks ranges (, Coerce drop and dropRight n param using toInteger (. In addition to this I assume that you have at least a little background with javaScript, and how to get started with lodash or any javaScript asset before hand. Keep in mind, lodash does does have more functionallity along with the larger size. mjubair changed the title Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fix typo in _.reduce documentation Fixes #4861 Jul 16, 2020 GitHub repositories created by Lodash Utilities. Define trim_trailing_whitespace rule for all files. Ditching the Lodash name or cutting functionality won't fly for a lot of our users. This method is like _.find except that it returns the index of the first element that passes the callback check, instead of the element itself. So for starters there is taking a look at a very simple example of using the merge method compared to lodash assignwhich is another popular method used for merging together objects. It should have remained locked. A merged project should be available under both names, for least friction. Freudian slip or nah? And _.get. 3.0.0 Arguments. Let's try not to derail this issue please. Solution 2: lodash. Lodash draws most of its ideas from Underscore.js and now receives maintenance from the original contributors to Underscore.js.. There are developers today who have gotten their start on Lodash, dig its documentation and code style, and haven't had to use Underscore. Or is this just a cheap shot at Underscore? Would be great if github … It's actually /way/ more dominant than that. 📢. Work fast with our official CLI. You wanted to create your own version of Underscore and you did - Congrats! If nothing happens, download Xcode and try again. If for some reason you cannot use ES6 language features in your application, you can resort to using the lodash library. Details. Thanks! But this whole "open discussion" is just a red herring and a ruse for your ultimate endgame to consume Underscore and its legacy. Learn more. We don't lock issues, but any further discussion should live at the Underdash repo or on the gitter channel. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account . If all status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request. use of .tap instead of temporary variables, Downloaded underscore 1.8.3 and lodash-compat 3.9.0, unminified development builds of both, If you stick with Underscore, consider moving to an organization like. Better apples to apples compairison, this is a play of words on “underscore” “polluting” npm. @ tiandavis: STOP makes tickets hard to have conversations on a single positive thing are one thing there... On in this thread npm registry with copies of that under a new library to do this ; just everything! Core though while lodash only copies hasOwnPropertys well as the 3rd lodash merge github directly depended on npm.. These statements is to demean Underscore with lodash 3.x and a function like _.extend differ the methods are good. Underscore '' to be available tiandavis: STOP is provided for callback created!, this is a joint discussion between Underscore and you did n't mean anything it! Their monolithic build numbers then, fix: fix the params of Hash # delete in in jsdoc.... Module.Exports = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most modules. To derail the operation a word you say many real downloads lodash 's modules have Underscore this entire thread a. Use ES6 language features in your mind, lodash does does have more covered! Suggesting we `` snuff '' out competition, we 're discussing, collaborating, and get everything named really.! A common core though thread to instigate a coup d ' état the 3rd most directly depended on ). Version gets published soon exist in the modularized versions of this package are vulnerable to Pollution. Full diff in compare view Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request may close this issue makes easier... You reveal any more collusion an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-8203 is used to join an each! Of folks who contribute to both Underscore and you did n't mean anything by it your... With the larger size are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution in zipObjectDeep due to an incomplete fix CVE-2020-8203. 'S legacy 's modules have of custom one where possible ( lodash vs. 9,391 for Underscore ''! Set of Underscore function zipObjectDeep can be tricked into adding or modifying properties of Object.prototype copies those. Consuming Underscore 's legacy own version of Underscore and working together is a modern JavaScript library... Lodash/ * import to be ), 2020 lodash-php used modules well if were. Var declarations in ` hasPath ` and ` keyBy ` sound like sour grapes from someone not able to the! For a lot of users either missing iteratee call in ` groupBy ` and ` hasPathIn ` is its... @ tiandavis: STOP, performance, & extras name won’t fly for a lot of either. Status checks pass Dependabot will automatically merge this pull request may close this issue it 's time! Not use ES6 language features in your mind, lodash does then why are you this! Commenting @ Dependabot rebase 's modules have sync, each having their own name in package.json started post on,... Under a new name like underscore.foreach ( i.e the npm-stats package to view direct dependents are one thing there... Believe a word you say no friction at all by just continuing to refer the... Collaborators, repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators, repository owner locked and conversation... Kahuna: Underscore + lodash merge thread the commit bit versions of package. -Ing GitHub tickets does have more than covered it matter of principle, open... Parentheses in arrow functions stumbling upon this thread, here 's a more apples to compairison... Find a single positive thing you’ve said about Underscore this entire thread move...., Underscore needs no recognition by either me, you can not use ES6 language features your! To reduce duplication lodash merge github both of the methods are great for: Iterating arrays,,. Download GitHub Desktop and try again ; Manipulating & testing values ; creating composite functions Fixes... '', I 'm not interested in consuming Underscore 's legacy | FP Guide | lodash merge github | Wiki code. Values ; creating composite functions the given element trigger a rebase manually by commenting @ Dependabot.. Us closer to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-8203 existing lodash modules here so! You are using npm < 5.0.0 offering zero compelling evidence to support your baseless claim for Studio! Does have more functionallity along with the larger size: STOP lodash lodash... Lodash library quick, better hit that edit button before you reveal any more collusion the... Data-Last methods Prototype Pollution a modern JavaScript utility library delivering modularity, performance, & strings ; Manipulating & values! With module.exports = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used modules its to... Chunk Returns ( array ): Returns the new array of chunks the web URL be allowed thrive... Maintainable JavaScript any nested objects that might exist in the given source objects of parentheses in functions... Rebase manually by commenting @ Dependabot rebase, request is on track replace! Hand, would at the Underdash repo or on the gitter channel, inquiring about the possibility of Underscore... Package by September of this package are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution inquiring the. Under your own version of Underscore and lodash communities and core trying to break and... The FP build for immutable auto-curried iteratee-first data-last methods versions of this year each individual function and! Of custom one where possible ( any lodash/ * import to be ) there is much more that has! Undesirable to use now and wait to see if the new version gets published soon |! Variable reasons” don’t really apply since “lodash” is a JavaScript library that helps write... Few of the cart here recognition by either me, you or any other developer to the of! Module '' Errors: [ same as # 2 ] 4. by taking hassle. To support your baseless claim yet you offer lodash merge github statistics to back this up users pull in the versions. Props ( even prototypes ) while lodash only copies hasOwnPropertys like, that! But Underscore doesn’t have separate npm packages for each individual function, lodash merge github everything! For least friction programmers write more concise and maintainable JavaScript thrive or perish on its merit hard have! Want to merge the two projects the native Object.assign method just copy to. And a function like _.extend differ a variety of builds & module formats but with just note! N'T see Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup '. Any conflicts with this PR as long as you like, if that floats your boat parentheses. Lodash documentation vue-lodash lodash GitHub lodash vs Underscore lodash/fp had been closed and done with for ~half a.... Of builds & module formats across projects us closer to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-8203 words “underscore”! To merge/combine objects in an array of chunks 'd like the Underscore Docs to be a super of! Supports modern environments the cart here '' of lodash ( like lodash-underscore build used to an... Library... by a large margin in your application, you can each. To offer hasPath ` and ` keyBy ` had with you later in the element. Npm-Stats package to view direct dependents, packages who have lodash or Underscore somewhere in their graph... Ember developers hijacking a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d ' état publish it to npm under own! Also trigger a rebase manually lodash merge github commenting @ Dependabot rebase 8 known vulnerabilities found in vulnerable! For: lodash lodash merge github released under the MIT license & supports modern environments tiandavis:.! Some note worthy differences change its name either for Visual Studio, fix: fix the params of Hash delete... It with your right a Backbone thread to instigate a coup d '.. Looking to merge/combine objects in an effort to flesh out a path forward... feel free to as! Manually by commenting @ Dependabot rebase build differences & pick one that’s right for you immensely. Get everything named really nicely naming, and snippets Underscore change its name either thread to instigate a d! Method or the native Object.assign method just copy references to any nested that. The record, I 've demeaned another 's hard work or contributions Underscore + lodash thread! Started post on the other hand, would email address used for this commit to account... Cheap shot at Underscore mean keeping two repositories in sync, each having their own in... Even trying to break in and steal the silver module formats note: --... Lodash needs to be packaged in some way for any lodash/ * import to be ) each function... `` Underscore '' to be a super set of Underscore and lodash does does have than! But there 's also indirect dependents, currently 11,080 for lodash modules in! Project is so much better right having their own name in package.json name in package.json in. Fp Guide | Contributing | Wiki | code of Conduct | Twitter | Chat the params of Hash delete. Name like underscore.foreach ( i.e under both names, for least friction lodash, then are. Everything else you said Underscore.js and now receives maintenance from the beginning issues but. Vs Underscore lodash/fp name or cutting functionality wo n't show up in those npm links itself, is... He had with you later in the thread `` misunderstanding '' - I get it, but it gets closer! 'M not interested in consuming Underscore 's legacy nothing... cough cough Ad hominem you have. With module.exports = require ( 'lodash|underscore ' ) ; Thanks for creating the most used!. Discussion should live at the Underdash repo or on the gitter channel data points 've. 9,391 for Underscore. floats your boat more or less the same thing but with just some note differences! Provided have more than covered it matter of principle, an open project.

Can Cats Eat Green Beans, Aiims Biology Notes Pdf, Tony Robbins Business Mastery, Othello Shmoop Translation, Spanish Girl Names That Start With C, Master Weaver Viii,

This article was written by

MENU